The Constitution is not a Plaything

by walterm on April 2, 2017

I have written quite a bit about how liberal progressives view the Constitution as a living, breathing document. Indeed, the Constitution is a living, breathing document, but not in the way liberals want it to live and breathe. To wit, recently U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (regrettably, my senator from California), criticized U.S. Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch as being an “originalist” who would interpret the Constitution as it was understood in 1789. This is a highly odd and false interpretation of how an originalist judge would rule. The Constitution lives and breathes through the amendment process, and it is not the same document as it was in its original form back in 1789. So Feinstein’s charge that Gorsuch, as a Supreme Court judge, would take us back to the days of segregation, bans on interracial marriage, and discrimination against LGBT Americans is just as laughable as it is moronic for a senior U.S. senator to make such a ridiculous statement. The only thing she demonstrated in making such hyperbolic comments was to pander to ethnic minorities and the LGBT lobby. I can think of no other useful purpose for her comments, and her opposition to Gorsuch exhibited no reasonable argument against his confirmation, particularly since she falsely characterized how he would rule as a Supreme Court judge.

The problem with senator Feinstein and those of her ilk are that they use the Constitution as a plaything to be used to their own bidding. They see it as living and breathing based on how they or a particular judge should interpret it, where the interpretation itself is evolving over time. So the Constitution should not be interpreted as originally intended, or as amended, but should be interpreted based on the current social milieu in which Democrats find themselves. Clearly, this would benefit Democrats as they see the world at any given point in time, and would disadvantage others since without a clear set of principles how could anyone know what is going on in the minds of Democrats? Republicans believe the Constitution should be interpreted based on the ideas as originally intended and amended, which provides a neutral standard by which people may be judged, regardless of the political leanings of the judge. The Constitution is not just for Democrats, but is for all Americans. So its interpretation should not evolve except through Constitutional amendments, as justice is supposed to be blind and irrespective of the ideology of a judge at any level.

We are also hearing more recently that liberals are suddenly in love with the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution regarding states’ rights, now that we have a Republican president, which reads as follows:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

When Barack Obama was president, liberals had absolutely no issues with the President exercising authority over state matters. A prime example, among others, is the bathroom mandate by the Obama administration that directed public schools, colleges, and universities to make accommodations for transgender students to access facilities consistent with their chosen, and not biological, gender identity. Well this is a local and state matter, not a matter for the federal government. It has since been overturned by current president Donald Trump through executive order, who correctly noted that this is not a federal matter. Liberals, of course, are up in arms. Yet these same liberals at the state level are going to the mat to prevent Trump from exercising a power that is delegated to the federal government, which is immigration policy. Various states are moving forward with sanctuary city policies that seek to block any cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, and have successfully sued to block Trump’s temporary travel ban from countries with a high propensity to export terrorists. These are two cases where there is clear federal constitutional authority. Thus, liberals are terribly confused.

My point here is that liberals don’t seem to care that the U.S. Constitution is quite perspicuous in terms of what are federal versus what are state matters. The federal government is now involved in so many things that it was not designed to do, and can’t do well with any degree of efficiency or effectiveness. The Constitution was meant to limit the federal government, but it also clearly delineates what are the legitimate functions of the federal government. As a conservative, I want a constitution that works for all of the people, not for some. Thus an originalist interpretation by any judge of any ideological stripe ensures us that all people are created equally, and not based on the ideology of the judge, whatever that ideology might be. The purpose of a judge is to interpret the law, and to, as much as human possible, dismiss any personal feelings or predispositions in doing so. Societies do change and evolve, but there are ideas that transcend the particular zeitgeist of any given time, subject to the whims of human existence. And if our society wishes to change how the Constitution is interpreted, we can deliberatively go through the process of amending it, instead of actively subverting it. Liberals should know that if they are successful in interpreting the Constitution any way they wish, then conservatives can do the same. It’s a lose-lose game that liberals should stop playing. The Constitution is not a toy to be played with.


{ Comments on this entry are closed }

One of the most interesting things to me about liberal progressives is that when they are making a moral argument, they will, with a straight face, intentionally lie about the actual position of those whom they oppose. For example, Gil Garcetti, mayor of Los Angeles, was speaking of being a sanctuary city today, and how morally wrong it is for the Trump administration to “separate children from their families because it is inhumane,” regarding the Trump administration pulling funds from sanctuary cities that won’t cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. He goes on to say, “we don’t demonize our hardworking neighbors just because they speak a different language or come from a different country.” Well the question is, who is doing that? The Trump administration is going after criminal illegal aliens. There is no intention to separate families, though that may happen incidentally if someone is here committing crimes and happens to have children.

What Garcetti is doing is dangerously telegraphing to illegal aliens is that if you have children here, then that’s your ticket to stay because he doesn’t believe in tearing apart a family even if a parent is a criminal illegal alien. I can hardly think of anything more irresponsible. Also, exactly who does he refer to that is demonizing people regarding their language or where they come from? I didn’t hear one word demonizing any particular person or group of people. We’re talking about people who are here illegally participating in criminal activity, and that is the only criteria. So please, liberal progressives, if you’re going to take a moral position, then be moral. To openly and intentionally lie about the position of those you oppose makes your moral point moot. You look disingenuous, which is exactly what you are if you must misrepresent the positions of others in order to appeal to the emotions of the people to whom you are speaking.


{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Senator Dianne Feinstein and Ideological Judges: Be Careful What You Wish For

March 21, 2017

I wanted to provide a little commentary about how Democrats are handling the Neil Gorsuch confirmation for U.S. Supreme Court justice, and ask my fair-minded liberal friends to consider just how bad this is and why they should not support this type of behavior from elected leaders when it comes to Supreme Court justice confirmations. […]

Read the full article →

Smaller Government is Best for Everyone, Including Liberals

March 20, 2017

So Donald Trump has proposed his budget, which has liberals apoplectic about the cuts to federal government agency and programs he is proposing. To this I would ask liberals, why are you so keen on a huge, expansive, federal government getting involved in virtually all aspects of American life? There are a number of things Trump […]

Read the full article →

HBO “VICE” on Climate Change: They’re Right and You’re a Bad Person

March 4, 2017

Tonight I watched an episode of the HBO news program “VICE” on Syria and climate change. For those who don’t have HBO, Bill Maher is the executive producer. So that should tell you immediately their reporting is going to have a far-left liberal progressive slant. Now this post is not to argue the merits of […]

Read the full article →

The Fake News “Muslim Ban” That Isn’t

January 29, 2017

On Friday, President Trump signed an executive order that, among other things regarding our refugee program, bars people from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from traveling to the U.S. temporarily for at least the next 90 days until the U.S. can develop better vetting procedures for people from these countries. Yet this is being […]

Read the full article →

Congressman John Lewis: A Warrior Whose Time Has Come and Gone

January 15, 2017

We have all seen those situations, particularly in professional sports, where a great warrior continues to play well beyond his prime and becomes more of a liability than an asset to the team. But that player is allowed to continue due to past glory and fan appreciation. It’s a hard thing to see someone in […]

Read the full article →

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to You!

December 25, 2016

A couple of days ago, I was listening to a discussion on either Fox News or Fox Business about holiday greetings while driving back to Southern California from Carmel. Particularly, the discussion was about whether to say “Merry Christmas” or not. Well someone did eventually say Merry Christmas on the show. Jessica Tarloff, a Democratic […]

Read the full article →

Transgender Bathroom Laws: A Return to Jim Crow?

December 18, 2016

On a bike ride the other day, I got into a discussion with a fellow rider about some of the transgender bathroom laws and policies that have been in the news as of late. My friend felt that allowing people to use a bathroom based on their gender identity as opposed to their biological gender […]

Read the full article →

Leveling the “Hater” or “Bigot” Charge: The Ultimate Conversation Stopper

December 10, 2016

In the wake of Donald Trump’s victory as the next President of the United States, liberals are up in arms about losing the social “gains” they made under eight years of liberal progressive Obama rule. They will no longer have the imprimatur of the Obama administration to force all manner of social engineering on the […]

Read the full article →